They hired Wilhelm to test the inks before they announced the printers and the data is on his site. The HP pigments had been rated much higher than Epson in the past also, only there was the problem with non HP media compatability. Now people are going to say he is in bed with HP I guess. He rated Canon and Epson about the same in longevity and much better color for HP. Black and white have all three doing very well thanks to the carbon content they all use now. We'll see. john --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@...> wrote: > > But is this real? Do we have any independent testing? (playing catch up > here) > > > > From: john dean <deanwork2003@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:26:15 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: VideoBlog on new HP Self-Profiling Printers > > > > > > You know what is odd about that video? It doesn't discuss the fact > that HP has more than doubled the print life of pigment inks over > both Epson and Canon while at least equaling their gamut? Which means > no spraying for fading or gloss issues. Strange that the marketing > people in Barcelona didn't even mention it! To me that is a lot more > significant than internal profile creation, as nice as that may be. > > john > > > . > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: VideoBlog on new HP Self-Profiling Printers
2006-10-01 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.