Digital BW, The Print

Ginny, I didn't mean to be provocative, sorry. 

If your marketing's grooved into 11X14 for some reason (economical
frames/mattes?), and if 11X17's not satisfactory (waste 3" of paper),
maybe roll paper's your answer? 

I shoot 6X7 as well...gorgeous format. 

JK

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ginnylady33"
<ginnylady33@...> wrote:
>
> 
> I'm using a Pentax 6X7, not 35 mm. 
> 
> I am not limiting myself to 11X14. It's just a size that I use for
> certain images and a size that many people prefer to purchase.
> 
>  I did not want to make this a debate about which size is best.
> That issue is a matter of taste and tastes vary greatly.
> 
> Ginny
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "djon43"
> <djon43@> wrote:
> >
> >  Obsessive 35mm photogs often wet-darkroom printed 9 X 13.5 on 11X14,
> > when they obsess on full format. 
> > 
> > 11X17 is for me at an optimum price point and IMO is MUCH more
> > impressive than "11X14" ever was with full 35mm format (eg 10.5 X
> > 16.75)....but it doesn't fit prints into "standard"  precut mattes.
> > Less paper wasted with 11X17 full format than 11X14 full format, too. 
> > 
> > I find 11X17 opens images up FAR better than Letter, while costing a
> > lot less than 13X19. 
> > 
> > Still, a 4000ppi scan of a fine chrome can be shockingly better at
> > 13X19 than at 11X17 (35mm Astia, with the right lenses, looks like 120
> > format)....wish I had a bigger printer than my 2200.  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ginnylady33"
> > <ginnylady33@> wrote:
> > >
> > >   Other than Epson Heavyweight Matte and Premium Glossy, are
there ANY
> > > papers out there available in 11X14 size? It's so strange to me that
> > > this size, which a I really like, is so hard to find.
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > Ginny
> > >
> >
>