wwodets wrote: > ...the K3/VFA/USFA > figures I report are because Epson is using dyes in these inks. I > don't think that's true and I hope that the Cone people can be a > little more constructive. I believe the Cone conjecture is correct. The Epson inks do not appear to be 100% pigment inks. I don't believe that Epson claims that they are either. I suspect that Epson uses a statistically significant amount of dyes in the K3 inks. You can of course do some analysis and determine the truth yourself. The problem with using color inks to make B&W prints, as I see it, is that the color inks can introduce problems like subtle color casts, color shifting from dark to light, and color casts due to differential fading (different colors fade at different rates). While the prints might look fine today, what will they look like tomorrow? It's not worth the risk to me. Clearly, YMMV. -- Bruce Watson/ /
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Hands-on impressions K3/ABW versus K7/QTR
2006-10-20 by Bruce Watson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.