Hello Walt, >In discussing these issues with a Cone >representative this morning, he informed me that the K3/VFA/USFA >figures I report are because Epson is using dyes in these inks. I >don't think that's true and I hope that the Cone people can be a >little more constructive. I also don't think there are dyes in K3 inks. I've been doing windowsill torture rests of various inks for several years now, and I know what happens to inks containing dyes in just a short period. A K3 print has been on my windowsill (unprotected and with some direct sunlight every day) for over a year now, and I can detect only the barest hint of change in a middle gray area. >I think this Epson system pretty much needs ICC profiling for both >best results and an easy, reliable, consistent workflow image to >image. I know that Clayton and others do PS curves for this purpose, >but this seems like an ongoing hassle to me...The need to do this >(and to own a densitometer) is the weakness of the K3/ABW system in >my appraisal. I just want to say that I don't consider it a hassle at all. The PS curves are very simple and quick, and once done they are saved with the image and reused. There is a great freedom in being able to quickly try various papers and do experiments without having to use a densitometer to make an icc curve for every ink/paper combination. I find this approach to be very simple and efficient. I hope this won't become a debate. I respect your views and understand what you are saying re the need for icc profiles, and don't really disagree - just that you and I are working with slightly different perspectives and preferences. I am responding to this only to ensure that some reader who is new to all this might not get a wrong impression that the non-icc workflow produces inferior results. The results are top notch: excellent dmax, open shadows, luminous highlights. It's just a different preference for how one wishes to work. 4. I am struck at this point about the amount of apparently >reflexive prejudice against Epson materials and processes. Same here. I find the Epson papers I use to be very fine, and the inks are stable. Withstanding a year on the windowsill with some direct south Florida sunlight every day without fading or color shifting is a remarkable feat, and Wilhelm rates K3/ABW from 110 - 300+ years, depending on conditions. That's pretty impressive. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Hands-on impressions K3/ABW versus K7/QTR
2006-10-20 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.