Ernst, From what I have read, our predecessors had only black and white vision and rods in their eyes. At some time in our evolutionary history, cones developed and a color system was superimposed on top of the original B&W system (not in place of). So we have both. In dim light, our color vision doesn't work very well, so we see only luminance using the rods, while in the light the cones come into action overlaying color info, but the luminance measured during the day comes from summing the output of the rods and the cones, not just the output of the rods. A good book that explains all this in relation to the use of color in art is:- 'Vision and Art: the Biology of Seeing' by Margaret Livingstone, Professor of Neurobiology at Harvard. One quote: - "Some aspects of visual perception - such as object recognition, face recognition, and of course color perception - depend heavily on color, whereas other aspects of vision - such as motion perception, depth perception, figure/ground segregation, and receiving positional information - are colorblind." Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernst Dinkla" <E.Dinkla@...> There's a much longer history of (artistic) monochrome representation of the world around us than the one with multi colors. Say 40.000 years against 4000 years. In no technology I can recall there has been multi-color first and monochrome later. So I think it must be baked in our genes meanwhile despite the fact that we see in colors. ...............................
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Grayscale Vs Color (was PFP with UT7)
2006-12-03 by Bob Frost
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.