Howard, > Am I right in thinking the Cyan ink is in the Yellow position? Yes. >Perhaps using the Photo Black as one of the gray inks has >made things more complicated than they would be by going > straight to the LK. With IJC I'd agree. However, with QTR's rather automatic method of doing the carbon core cross-overs, it's working fine. One of the main reasons the PK is there is to be able to print on glossy paper without changing any inks. While in a 2200 it's not big deal, this is a test bed for the 7600 - 9600 also. There is it a big deal. > Does the extra ink in this position make a significant difference > in the shadow area? It adds just a bit more smoothness -- barely noticeable. Frankly, once one has a 3k system, the quality differences above that are more academic than real. In the 220 and 1280 I'll probably have just 3k's (to facilitate the Epson driver approaches), and I expect them to make prints that can hang next to the best. > It could be that the PK has caused the tonal variation you > have had to fix with the Cyan ink. No, the slight warming is the Eboni coming in. It's so dense it can overwhelm any of the colors. Even full cyan can only offset Eboni up to about density 1.5. After that there will be a slight rise in warmth until the Eboni starts to get cooler as it approaches its dmax. I could have put more of the light colors in the mix, but I wanted to roll that curve off gently to avoid the smoothing algorithm from going berserk and sticking artifacts elsewhere in the curve. (The QTR curve preview is not, from what I can tell, an accurate view of what is actually happening. It seems to lack the smoothing algorithms that are, no doubt, in the actual ink distribution algorithms. It's also got a bug in it that allows it to work only on the first of these table-derived curves.) At any rate, since I had the cyan in the printer, I used it rather than lots of LLC and LM. The image is so dark down there that the rather minor tone variations are not really very significant. Actually, the PK is more neutral than the lighter grays. As such, it required less color, thus increasing the lightfastness in that area. This is consistent with what I found with the LLLK also. The lighter the carbon, the more color inks are needed. The most lightfast inkset is the BO version, but I like smoothness and tone control. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] QTR profile for 2200, 4K+ inkset, and Matte BW paper
2006-12-20 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.