Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re:roller marks with 3800 (was: Re: Epson 3800 for digital negative

2006-12-24 by atodzia@cox.net

It's differences in coatings on paper. Using regular Epson luster and
glossy paper, and similar papers, you don't need to increase dry time
or worry about pizza wheel marks.

On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:57:05 -0600, you wrote:

>>I printed 4 - 8 x 10's on letter sized F-Gloss this afternoon. 1440
>>dpi, high speed on, dry time of 2 secs. print time averaged 7min and
>>15 secs each.
>
>What would the print time have been WITHOUT the delay?
>
>>In my limited trials with the 3800, the pizza marks I have seen so far
>>appear minor to me. I need strong lighting for them to be obvious, and
>>other viewers have not noticed them in the print yet.
>
>>I have tried it with Epson glossy
>>papers, Ilford Gallery Smooth Glossy, Lexjet fiber gloss, black and
>>white and color and NO trouble feeding or with pizza tracks. I even
>>as I mentioned earlier put a sheet in upside down and ink never
>>dried, but no pizza tracks.
>Thanks, guys. This makes me feel more confident.
>
>I have read here about the 4800 having some sort of vacuum system. I have
>never seen a 4800 up close and never printed on me but this system does
>use roller wheels from what I have read. Is that correct?
>
> I have an R2400 and never a problem with wheel marks. Correct me if I'm
>wrong but don't the 2400 and 3800 have similar paper feed mechanisms?
>
>So what does this sound like to you 3800 early adopters: wheel marks on a
>few (possibly out of spec?) units? a driver setting problem? inexperienced
>users? bad luck?
>
>Dave.
>
>PS. Thanks to Bob Michaels for the D-roller URL.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.