I wouldn't get the 4000 for B&W. I would get the 4800. On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:31:28 -0000, you wrote: >I was quite excited about that possibility wwith the 3800, due to some previous posts. >Guess I'll scrap that idea and consider a 4000. > >Sarah > > > > >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "eddiegnz1" <eddiegnz1@...> >wrote: >> >> Isn't it also true that the printer also uses a tiny bit of yellow >> (or some other color and not just the K, LK, LLK)? >> >> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" >> <cj@> wrote: >> > >> > Please everyone, >> > >> > Stop referring to the "Black" setting in the 4800 and 3800 as BO. >> It >> > is _not_ BO. BO means Black Only, meaning just one ink. The Black >> > setting on these K3 printers uses black (MK or PK) plus LK and >> LLK, so >> > it's using three inks. Please call it something else, such as 3BK >> or >> > BGG or something. Calling it BO is just going to create a great >> > amount of confusion and miscommunication. >> > >> > BO is a specific way of printing that is completely different than >> the >> > "Black" setting on these printers. Thanks very much. >> > >> > >> > Regards, >> > Clayton >> > >> > >> > Info on black and white digital printing at >> > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm >> > >> >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 4800/3800 "Black" setting is not BO - thanks, Clayton!
2006-12-24 by atodzia@cox.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.