Digital BW, The Print

www.shadesofpaper.com has the D-roller on sale with free shipping. 

On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 11:32:50 -0500, you wrote:

>It's differences in coatings on paper. Using regular Epson luster and
>glossy paper, and similar papers, you don't need to increase dry time
>or worry about pizza wheel marks.
>
>On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:57:05 -0600, you wrote:
>
>>>I printed 4 - 8 x 10's on letter sized F-Gloss this afternoon. 1440
>>>dpi, high speed on, dry time of 2 secs. print time averaged 7min and
>>>15 secs each.
>>
>>What would the print time have been WITHOUT the delay?
>>
>>>In my limited trials with the 3800, the pizza marks I have seen so far
>>>appear minor to me. I need strong lighting for them to be obvious, and
>>>other viewers have not noticed them in the print yet.
>>
>>>I have tried it with Epson glossy
>>>papers, Ilford Gallery Smooth Glossy, Lexjet fiber gloss, black and
>>>white and color and NO trouble feeding or with pizza tracks. I even
>>>as I mentioned earlier put a sheet in upside down and ink never
>>>dried, but no pizza tracks.
>>Thanks, guys. This makes me feel more confident.
>>
>>I have read here about the 4800 having some sort of vacuum system. I have
>>never seen a 4800 up close and never printed on me but this system does
>>use roller wheels from what I have read. Is that correct?
>>
>> I have an R2400 and never a problem with wheel marks. Correct me if I'm
>>wrong but don't the 2400 and 3800 have similar paper feed mechanisms?
>>
>>So what does this sound like to you 3800 early adopters: wheel marks on a
>>few (possibly out of spec?) units? a driver setting problem? inexperienced
>>users? bad luck?
>>
>>Dave.
>>
>>PS. Thanks to Bob Michaels for the D-roller URL.