Joost Horsten wrote: > First of all, a happy 2007 to you all! I hope in this year the world > will not be as black and white as our pictures ;-) A happy 2007 for all. > So this probably points to the source of my problems with the EEM/Eboni > targets. I have noticed before that the eboni prints are quite > sensitive (note my remark on the printer rollers in the original post). > I have done nothing special with the targets, neither handled them > roughly, but also did not protect them in a special way. The have just > been laying around for a day or two. But that's maybe not the way to > deal with them. > > Going back to the semi-matte camera target, another, slightly related > explanation could be that I did not actually clean the target, but put > some tiny bit of grease on them with my finger, thereby "polishing" it. > In that way, it might be on optical effect, perhaps similar to the > difference between matte and glossy papers. Then again, it would be an > inherent effect of the matte print. > > Does this make sense to anyone? It could be different on the Eye One but my SpectroCam is quite sensitive to the distance to the target and the angle. The automatic measuring setup with an old HP plotter had the spectrometer slightly higher at first and the results were darker readings. A slightly different angle of the head on the patch showed similar changes. I had already made another strip guide that allows longer strips to be measured manually and that works good. The head doesn't touch the strip but is at the right height and a thin PET foil protects the rest of the target when the spectrometer is running over it. I'm an advocate for multiple targets and multiple measurements + averaging. The SpectroCam does that already on its way over the patches, between 7-15 readings per patch. But I use more targets where possible, the targets printed in another direction etc. An interesting fact about the HP Z3100 and Z2100 is that the integrated calibration and profiling measures per patch and the dark patches get a longer time for the measurement. Something that is difficult to achieve with strip reading or one should increase the size of the dark patches. Any change in the surface of matte black should give different readings. Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Wildly varying Dmax
2007-01-01 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.