Barium sulphate used to be known as barytes or barite (among other names) but in photography the paper made using a layer of barium sulphate (applied as a suspension in gelatine) has been known as baryta paper for over a hundred years. It isn't a clay at all, clays - including pipeclay - are hydrated aluminium silicates. I think all fibre base photo papers were baryta papers, at least within living memory. Not urban folklore, but what all the text books said. Clay fillers are used in some non-photographic papers. Titanium dioxide is generally preferred as a white pigment for inkjet papers - it is the most commonly used white pigment for other purposes also. I don't know of any reason to suppose that baryta would give better results, though again I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be ok. Harman are of course used to coating paper with baryta, so it may fit better into their manufacturing process, using the same coating machines as their photographic paper. Peter Peter Marshall _________________________________________________________________ My London Diary http://mylondondiary.co.uk/ London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/ The Buildings of London etc: http://londonphotographs.co.uk/ and elsewhere...... djon43 wrote: > Ernst and John, thanks. > > Reading online and in your helpful posts, "baryta" is the common > misnomer for the clay coating that uses a barite additive to create a > surface color, including both warm and bright white. > > It appears that neither the clay substrate nor its barite that > ultimately defines inkjet detail resolution, but rather the type of > top layer. > > I find branding/hype/folklore/pricing interesting. It was common > knowledge years ago that the best papers, including Dupont Varilour > and Agfa Brovira/Portriga, had a "baryta" clay coating, and we > understood this to be almost as important as the amount of silver > laid on top of it. Was this urban folklore or truth? :-) > > Even if I could afford Harman in the sizes I like, I'd compare to the > MC Lustre simultaneously, hoping to save several dollars per sheet > for comparable quality. > > Whose hype is most accurate, Inkjet Art's or Harman's? > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla > <E.Dinkla@...> wrote: > >> djon43 wrote: >> >> >>> Harman asserts they're alone with baryta. >>> >>> Is some clay other than baryta used? >>> >>> Baryta's only advantage vs other clays(the reason Kodak used it >>> > for > >>> Kodabromide)was its natural whiteness. It was called "pipeclay" >>> > in the > >>> Royal Marines of the 18th century, used to whiten uniforms (just >>> > a tidbit) > >>> The "fineness" would be irrelevant, since it's ground to whatever >>> degree is necessary. >>> >> I wouldn't call Barium Sulphate/Sulfate a clay. It isn't pipe >> clay. It is more an ore. Barium Sulfate should be called >> Barite or Baryte and not Baryta which is Barium Hydroxide. The >> last you wouldn't like to use as a coating as it is a strong >> base and water soluble. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryta >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barite >> http://www.sharlot.org/archives/photographs/19th/book/chapter_2.html >> >> The last link describes the use of Barite as a whitener for >> paper since the 1820's and as a whitener for photographic >> paper since1880. >> >> >> > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Micro Ceramic Lustre Vs (presumably) Harman
2007-03-01 by Peter Marshall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.