My only experience was with pre-production samples of Silver Rag. With the ImagePrint profiles, the prints appeared identical to Ilford fiber VC. However, there was something about the surface I didn't like. Someone said "spangly". I've pretty much settled on Epson Velvet Fine Art for everything. The only drawback I've found is that it is a fragile surface. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of djon43 > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:08 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Matte Papers vs. newer Silver Rag type papers > > I've seen fine examples in B&W print exchanges and, although I > understand why some love them, I don't. > > They "glitter" a little, which isn't bad in itself but I think it > defeats the air-dried-glossy effort. On the other hand, examples of > Hahnemuele (sp?) Photo Rag have been attractive enough that I might > order some, next time I'm feeling spendy. > > The most appealing new-to-me paper is Epson Velvet Fine Art, which > looks a lot like Kodak's best B&W paper ever, whose name I don't > remember except that it involved "portrait". Kodak's was good enough > that I used it sometimes instead of Brovira :-) I'd use this paper > for portraits, for sure, but don't think its character would > contribute to my other goals...though maybe it'd remind someone of > Portriga Rapid. >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Matte Papers vs. newer Silver Rag type papers
2007-04-14 by Ken Carney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.