Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: What does CS3 have to offer for printing?

2007-05-05 by Eric Neilsen Photo

Clayton, The only gotcha that I ran across was the WOW factor. As another CS
user upgrading to 3, I missed the added tools of 2 as well. There is an
additional wrap function that if you are in design and need to use PS more
as a construction tool rather than an image enhancement tool, could prove
very useful. So far since installing it, I have not had any issues with
performance. In fact, a video issue with CS has gone away going to CS3. 

 

The most useful tool so far is the new selection tool. 

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214-827-8301

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

 

Skype : ejprinter

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Clayton
Jones
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 8:50 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: What does CS3 have to offer for printing?

 

Hello Ed,

>...Non-destructive filtering, a very nice color-to-b&w
>conversion tool, a much improved brightness and contrast adjustment,
>and a MUCH MUCH improved method of stitching together panoramic >images.
> 
>New levels of control in the clone and healing tools help a lot with
>problems like photo-restoration, as well as more overt photo 
>manipulation.

Thanks for the good info. I'm seriously considering CS3 (I'm
currently using CS and so will be getting the CS2 features for the
first time as well) and am wondering if there are any
memory/performance issues with CS3, or any other gotchas that might be
helpful to know in advance. Thanks very much.

Regards,
Clayton

Info on black and white digital printing at 
http://www.cjcom. <http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm> net/digiprnarts.htm

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.