David, >Paul - How does this compare to K7? It's a different direction. K7 uses the most crossovers with the lightest inks for the maximum smoothness. The 100% carbon approach is not for maximum smoothness but for the most stable print. It uses no crossovers and no dilute inks. The only reason it is reasonably smooth is that it uses the 1.5 picoliter dots of the R800/1800, and it uses 3 channels to hide the microbanding. >How is it possible to do split toning when all the inks are the same? It's how the paper reacts with the carbon. I'm not doing a thing with profiling. It's all in the paper choice. It's not for everyone, but I suspect there are quite a few people who are bothered by the color inks in the B&W prints, not to mention all the complexity that has come into what should be a relatively simple process. It's just another option for B&W, and one I'm having quite a bit of fun with at the moment. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: R800-1800 Eboni -- Comparison of LensWork split-tone to Photo Rag and other papers.
2007-05-24 by Paul Roark