Paul Roark wrote: > The 100% carbon approach is not for maximum smoothness but for the most > stable print. It uses no crossovers and no dilute inks. The only reason it > is reasonably smooth is that it uses the 1.5 picoliter dots of the > R800/1800, and it uses 3 channels to hide the microbanding. Which has been my theoretical advice for the best BO printing possible when Clayton Jones wrote his first messages on BO printing in this list and not everyone could get the quality Clayton got. Next step in quality would be more weaving strokes. See the Multihead BO thread in 2003. Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: R800-1800 Eboni -- Comparison of LensWork split-tone to Photo Rag and other papers.
2007-05-24 by Ernst Dinkla