i did BO printing w/ Epson 1280, but sold it prior to getting a 2400. big mistake. for black and white prints i got better results w/ BO, 1280 method...actually, much better than anything i've been able to eek out of the 2400 following Clayton's 2400 instructions. also, i no longer need wide format. finally, i don't shoot film. my files come from a canon 5d. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "djon43" <djon43@...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin" > <vinket@> wrote: > > > > 8.5x11 prints only. under $150.00, but I'd still like to see a > comprehensive list of all > > machines that do it, regardless of cost...if one exists. > > Find Clayton Jones...if anybody knows, he does. > > fyi, I've proven to my own satisfaction that Black Only is an inferior > way to make prints unless one isn't bothered by the dots...which are > quite evident in sharp paper. The smaller the print the more > significant the dots because they remain fixed in size irrespective > the print size. They look something like grain in small prints, vanish > in larger prints at "viewing distance." I think it can be attractive > with grainless files such as digicam but it conflicts with grain if > you're working with a high resolution scan of silver film. >
Message
djon43
2007-07-16 by Kevin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.