Digital BW, The Print

David, 

 

With the R800/1800 setup I'm using QTR is used for the B&W and the Epson
driver is used for the color.  I've posted a number of profiles for the
system, and it's very easy to profile since there is no color to coordinate.

 

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 11:25 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: smaller printer for mainly black and white?

 

Paul, et al, thanks for this info. I like the idea of being about to 
have both color and b/w carbon inkset in one printer, and making only 
matte is really no problem as its what I mainly do now. 

Would I be controlling the b/w printing from the printer's driver, or 
with a RIP (like Quadtone)?

Best, David

--- In DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> >I assume that R800 and R220 are printer numbers, 
> >but I don't know what 3MK and UT-3D mean? 
> 
> The 220 was a great bargain and ran the UT-3D inkset -- see
> http://www.paulroar <http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/UT-3D_Readme.pdf>
k.com/BW-Info/UT-3D_Readme.pdf Unfortunately, 
the 220
> is not longer made.
> 
> The R800 (and R1800) were the first to use the very small 1.5 
picoliter
> drops. As such, they are also the first to be able to print what I 
consider
> photo quality, 100% carbon prints. See
> http://www.paulroar <http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/R1800.pdf>
k.com/BW-Info/R1800.pdf I'm personally trying 
to move
> all my printing to 100% carbon to avoid the problems color inks 
introduce.
> The R800/1800 setup also allows color printing, but not glossy -- 
just
> matte. Custom B&W only setups could easily also print glossy, but 
I thought
> the full color + B&W would be the more popular (and I needed color 
for a project). So that is what I set up first.
> 
> Paul > www.PaulRoark.com

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]