Digital BW, The Print

Paul,

BTW thanks for the Red River profiles and comments. I already have
some on order. :)

I just had this crazy idea. If 3MK works for matte paper, could one
use 3 of the remaining channels for a 3PK glossy approach?

I know it would not be as pure carbon on cotton. But might be a 'nice
to have' for some?

Denis Bouchard

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> 
> >I know you've used the 3mk on Arches #140Bright White HP.
> >I'd like to know if you've tried the NATURAL version...
> 
> I have not tried the Natural.  I assume it is warmer – could be
interesting
> for some uses.  
> 
> >Have you tried printing on [Red River Ultra Pro Satin 2.0] with 3-MK?
> 
> As with all glossy types of paper, Eboni MK will not stick. 
Spraying might
> nail it down, but I don't think it'd be worth the effort.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> scott_now_coming
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 3:40 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Arches #140 w/3MK (was:Re: Red River Ultra Pro
Satin
> 2.0)
> 
> Paul,
> 
> 
> I'm wondering if the dmax is the same (or higher!) as the Bright White 
> version.
> 
> Thanks,
> Scott
>