At 04:17 AM Tuesday 11/13/2007, you wrote: >Cotton is maximum-destructive, both in terms of soil >depletion and in terms of wasted croplands (should be >food...or perhaps hemp)...we like to think of cotton >as earth-conscious but that's wildly off base. However, if the cotton in my Entrada 300 has been previously used for jeans and t-shirts, surely the damage has already been done? And my 100" roll of PremierArt Matte every three months must be small fry compared to someone who buys a newspaper every day? I'm trying to make myself feel better about my consumption as you can see!! I see that Jon Cone is now advertising refillable cartridges for his colour inks (I got an email today) ... alas, not for the Epson 2100. No matter what one does, sometimes it seems to be the wrong thing. Ah well, an interesting topic. thanks all of you for your informative posts. Richard -- Backroads Essay: http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/TheBackroadsOfWarkworth Greeting Cards available for purchase: http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/GreetingCards http://photos.smallfield.vze.com http://smallfield.vze.com "An apology for the devil: it must be remembered that we have heard one side of the case. God has written all the books." --Samuel Butler
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Printing with less environmental footprint ...?
2007-11-15 by Richard Smallfield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.