Eric Ashworth wrote: "... the purpose of the cartridges is to provide a supply of ink that does not readily flow unless there is enough suction to draw air into the cart to replace the used ink. And as a means of holding the cartridge's chip in place so as to make contact with the print head so it is recognized by the printer." Eric - First of all, I am NOT an expert but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night. I have been thinking about this myself but I have some critical questions and observations mostly pertaining to small format like the 2200/2400/1800 printers. 1) It seems that one obvious point is the need for a firm seal between the tubes and the "nipples" in the head. A lot of complaints about CIS systems now seem to result from the cart fitting loosely and not making a good enough seal. Air getting into the cart from the head-end is not a good thing. Venting is. With the right size tube and a small zip tie or clamp the tubing could be secured but it would be a "bitch" getting it done in such a confined space. I have had good luck inserting tubes over these "nipples" or "needles" for the purpose of injecting cleaner through the heads (NOT recommended except as a last resort). However, the tube will eventually come loose if it's not more securely clamped. 2) There appears to be the need for some kind of "damper" such as the ones used on the large format printers to suppress larger particulates. Perhaps the large format dampers could be used in lieu of the carts?? What other role does the damper play? 3) Some large format carts are pressurized, some not. Is it suction at work or pressure? Which is it in the small format printers... Appears to be suction. However, I can say that most CIS systems are HIGHLY sensitive to gravity and placing the bottles even a little too high will result in a mess of ink dripping through the head. Bottles too low will result in starvation and may even draw ink back from the head causing air bubbles or air in the lines. In fact, some people have reported that it's not enough to get the bottles at the right height but that the level of the ink in the bottles should be level with the head at al times. The bottles need to be raised as the ink is used for best results (hearsay). Part of what has kept me from moving forward has to do with unanswered questions about the role of gravity vs. suction vs. pressure in these printers and an inadequate understanding on my part of just how the ink is regulated. Pumps pull ink through for cleaning but what causes the ink to flow while printing? Are these things known or are we just taking a shot in the dark. It also seems obvious that building a good CIS is more complicated than it seems. There are a lot of problems reported. Heck, there are people getting clogs with OEM carts too. Why some and not others? Printer tolerances? Climatic conditions? Humidity? Atmospheric pressure? Black magic? Carts that aren't sitting tight enough? Who does know? Any engineers out there or ex Epson folks who really understand this stuff? Hmmm.. Lots of food for thought but too little time to digest... Rick Colson
Message
Re:Hypothetical Cart-Less CIS?
2007-11-15 by Rick Colson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.