Digital BW, The Print

Peter, I never really noticed too much of a change in the flattening process
or in mounting. I was referring more to the temp of the air on the surface
while going from wet to dry. I am in the process of setting up some test
printers and I 'll do some glossy papers when I have them up and running.
Until then, I am still a matte kind of guy. 

 

 

Eric

 

Eric Neilsen Photo

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214 827-8301

 

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

SKype ejprinter

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of zonepeter
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 5:02 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Glossy Quality RE: [Digital BW] Re: Damned good glossy prints

 

So I plugged in the old mounting press (amazing how dusty it has 
gotten). Tried a sheet of Innova Semi Matte. No change. Then I 
tried a sheet of Harman. Not sure. I certainly feels different. 
(like happens with SG) I think it is a bit more glossy (not what it 
needs) I don't have 2 identical prints to compare. Any changes are 
fairly subtle side by side comparison of the same print to be sure.
Interesting stuff.

Peter
--- In DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "E Neilsen" 
<e.neilsen2@...> wrote:
>
> Steve, Have you or anyone else compared these papers with heat 
drying vs
> just air drying? And posted the results any where? If I needed to 
change the
> gloss quality of a SG paper, I could change the heat under which 
they dried.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Eric Neilsen Photo
> 
> 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
> 
> Dallas, TX 75226
> 
> 214 827-8301
> 
> 
> 
> http://ericneilsenp <http://ericneilsenphotography.com> hotography.com
> 
> SKype ejprinter
> 
> 
> 
> _____ 
> 
> From: DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven
> Karafyllakis
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 1:14 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Damned good glossy prints
> 
> 
> 
> Sarah;
> 
> An issue we haven't really come to grips with! Someone mentioned 
Ilford 
> Galerie as a paradigm...I used mostly Ilford MGFB lately, which was 
> glossier; Kodak's FB papers were a bit different still; so what 
> are "we" looking for? what we're getting is a range, just like we 
had 
> in SG papers; Once the gloss-differential problem is solved 
(without 
> spraying I hope) I think we'll be in excellent shape!
> 
> Steve Karafyllakis
> 
> >> what so many of us are truly looking for in these 
> > papers. It sure isn't hard to figure out if one spends even a 
half 
> hour reading the posts! ;^)
> > 
> > Sarah
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]