> There is no silver bullet, or easy answer to your question. So true. I think there might be some generalities. With respect to smoothness, more inks firing generally gives a smoother image, but the quality of the printer is a major variable here. Also, there is, as they say in economics, decreasing marginal utility to more inks. In most printers after 3 or 4 ink, the differences are so minimal as to be insignificant. Even in my old 7500, while I have 6 carbon inks in it how, I have omitted the lightest and second darkest (between LK and K) with no significant (what normal viewers would see) difference. Of course, as one adds more inks, one loses the flexibility of, for example, variable tones, glossy and matte, etc. With respect to clogging, I think the binder is a major variable. Matte inksets can use much less. In fact, with the lightest carbon inks I'm using I've been experimenting with diluting them with a base that has no binder (aside from what was in the oringinal Eboni), and the impact on the light inks sticking to the paper is insignificant. So, while the latest glossy compatible inks from MIS are very good with respect to clogging, in my tests the carbon inks I'm mixing with matte base or a base with no binder at all appear to clogg less. Again, of course, there is an obvious trade-off: no glossy paper printing. Paul www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.PaulRoark.com> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Another post on Cone vs UT7 for 2100/2200
2008-01-01 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.