pglombick wrote: > There was a comment earlier about throwing out the "garbage" blue > channel. While I may be in the minority here, I find the blue channel > often contains the element I am looking for to make certain images pop > or stand out. An example is a field of different lavender types that I > shot at a lavender farm this summer. Or one time I shot a portait of a > friend practicing yoga. As he had grey eyes and a fair complection, the > blue channel gave a dramamtic look to the portrait, while the green and > red channel version looked rather mundane. True, it usually contains > more noise, especially in the shadows, but careful noise treatment of > the blue channel can usually bring this to within acceptable levels. > I find that the blue channel often has the greatest amount of shadow detail. It's also great for emphasising atmospheric haze & recession and for simulating antique film types. I think they must have been biased to blue light. Howard
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: B&W Conversion Techniques
2008-01-25 by Howard Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.