Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: B&W Conversion Techniques

2008-01-25 by Howard Shaw

pglombick wrote:
> There was a comment earlier about throwing out the "garbage" blue 
> channel. While I may be in the minority here, I find the blue channel 
> often contains the element I am looking for to make certain images pop 
> or stand out. An example is a field of different lavender types that I 
> shot at a lavender farm this summer. Or one time I shot a portait of a 
> friend practicing yoga. As he had grey eyes and a fair complection, the 
> blue channel gave a dramamtic look to the portrait, while the green and 
> red channel version looked rather mundane. True, it usually contains 
> more noise, especially in the shadows, but careful noise treatment of 
> the blue channel can usually bring this to within acceptable levels.
> 

I find that the blue channel often has the greatest amount of shadow 
detail. It's also great for emphasising atmospheric haze & recession and 
for simulating antique film types. I think they must have been biased to 
blue light.

Howard

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.