I have been to a few exhibits lately and I am showing a few of my own pieces, and I am wondering what the consensus is (if any) on signing prints. I have seen the artist sign the mat below the print, but for pratical considerations, I do not want to do this, as I am offering prints for sale without the mat or frame. Or is it more common so sell matted prints? I have also seen artists use a mat that has an opening too large for the print, effectively floating it. They sign the board to which the print is attached. This look tends to leave rather messy edges around the margins of the print (in my opinion), unless they are torn and that is the look one is going for. I guess another alternative would be to sign the print directly, which seems to detract from the image, especially if you want a title. I suppose one could sign, title, and date the back, but it would rarely, if ever be seen. Is there a consensus on this topic? i have yet to see a satisfactory method. Regards, Paul G.
Message
Signing Prints
2008-03-02 by pglombick
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.