I either sign the mat or I print on large enough paper where I sign the paper below the actual print then either sell just the print for the customer to mat and frame or I cut a mat larger than the print so the title and signature show. HTH, Tom From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of pglombick Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 8:50 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Signing Prints I have been to a few exhibits lately and I am showing a few of my own pieces, and I am wondering what the consensus is (if any) on signing prints. I have seen the artist sign the mat below the print, but for pratical considerations, I do not want to do this, as I am offering prints for sale without the mat or frame. Or is it more common so sell matted prints? I have also seen artists use a mat that has an opening too large for the print, effectively floating it. They sign the board to which the print is attached. This look tends to leave rather messy edges around the margins of the print (in my opinion), unless they are torn and that is the look one is going for. I guess another alternative would be to sign the print directly, which seems to detract from the image, especially if you want a title. I suppose one could sign, title, and date the back, but it would rarely, if ever be seen. Is there a consensus on this topic? i have yet to see a satisfactory method. Regards, Paul G. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Signing Prints
2008-03-02 by Tom Maugham
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.