Thanks Paul, It turns out that I have to upgrade to CS3 anyway as processing raw files from my new Canon G9 requires Camera Raw 4.2 which is not backward compatible with CS2. While I usually feel upgrades are worth the money, at times I still feel like I rent PS. Steve --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Grant" <gphoto2@...> wrote: > > Bridge in CS3 is nothing like Lightroom. The Camera Raw of CS3 is almost > identical to Lightroom although there are a few subtle differences. > > > > Paul > > > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen > Kobrin > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 10:52 AM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Lightroom and PSCS3 > > > > I current use both Lightroom an PSCS2. I really like the ability to > organize photographs in lightroom and use some of the "raw" > adjustments on JPEGs ( I understand their effect is limited.) > However, I find going between the two a bit clumsy and would prefer > one program. Question: how much of Lightroom's capabilities have been > incorporated in CS3? If Bridge in CS2 has been replace by a > Lightroom-like organizer in CS3, I would upgrade in a minute. > > Steve > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Lightroom and PSCS3
2008-03-03 by Stephen Kobrin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.