Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] re: Lenswork silver prints

2002-02-06 by Scott Hendershot

Rich,

I am also using Copygraphics. Peter Ellzey has been a big help. I have only
done a couple of rounds of tests on my adjustmet curves. My first results
were fairly disappointing. I am using a cold light enlarger as the light
source and printing on Ilford Multigrade paper.

My first test was with the Folberg curve and a diffusion dither. The
resulting print is rather harsh and grainy looking.

Second neg was done with the Lenswork curve at 300 line screen. 300 instead
of 425 because the image has large areas of gentle gradation that I wanted
to preserve. The resulting print is very flat with vieled highlights.

Back to the Folberg curve for some more testing. I found that the negatives
do not react to paper grade changes the same way conventional negatives do.
It seems that the contrast is determined more by exposure than by paper
grade. Using the same Folberg curve neg I made new prints with a grade 1
filter. I had to increase the exposure by one half stop to get the same
density in the blacks. The resulting print has lower contrast, but more
importantly to me is that the harsh grainy look has softened consideralby.
Adjusting the exposure changes the density of the shadows but has little
effect in the highlights.

I would be very interested in your experiences.

Scott

----- Original Message -----
From: "rcoda" <rcoda@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:54 AM
Subject: [Digital BW] re: Lenswork silver prints


> You can find his process here:
>
> http://www.lenswork.com/lwsprimer1.htm
>
> It is similar to Dan Burkholder's process, but they
> use different screening technologies. Lenswork uses a 450 line
> halftone (like a newspaper only MUCH finer) where Dan uses a very
> high resolution (2400-4800 dpi) stochastic (diffusion dither) bitmap.
>
> I have tried his inkjet negatives routine but was not impressed at
> all (the materials, not the process). I just got an imagesetter
> negative done last week as a test from one of his recommended
> sources, Copygraphics in NM (http://www.copygsf.com), and am now
> waiting for another from another source to check and see which is
> best. The one I'm waiting for is Ataraxia Studio in PA. They can
> output 3600 dpi stochastic negs for enlarged contact printing.
> www.atxstudio.com
>
> Rich
>
> http://www.rcodaphotography.com
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.