The 220 with the MIS R2 inks probably makes smoother B&W prints than the 800 3MK would. The 3MK was, in part, an effort to get the color inks out of the mix. Whether having color inks in the image is a concern probably depends on whether you're intent is to make the most stable long term prints (like for genealogy or museum reproductions that I do), or you simply want good B&W prints that will have a reasonably long life -- which the 220 and the MIS R2 inks can certainly do well. I found the R800 I had for a while to be terrible with thick paper. Paul www.PaulRoark.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tim4peace2001" <images4peace@...> wrote: > > Hello. I am printing B&W with an Epson 220 with MIS B&W inks. I am > very pleased with the results. Would I notice an improvement in the > quality of prints if I was to use an R800 using the Multi-Channel 100% > Pure Carbon ink method as per Paul Roark? Would I be able to use a > larger variety and thicker paper with the R800? Thank you. > > Francis >
Message
Re: R800 Vs. R220 Black and White w/ MIS Ink
2008-03-26 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.