> If you want better B/W I think you should be looking at 3rd party B/W > specific inks ala Piezography or MIS. Which aren't really available > for the 3800 yet, but may be in a few months. If someones comes up with an all carbon inkset and profiles for the 3800 supporting both glossy and b&W, and is superior to k3 with ABW, I'd buy it in a heartbeat!! And others would too... Meanwhile, the ABW K3 is pretty awesome esepcailly for gloss pares ... SteveB --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dealy663" <dealy663@...> wrote: > > I just gave up on Epson Enhanced Matte when I moved up to the > Ultrachrome K3 printers. For me that ink/paper combo just didn't work > very well. I never tried ImagePrint on the K3 printers, but even with > my own custom profile of EEM on K3 it still just didn't work very well. > > I bought ImagePrint for the 2200 and returned it. I just couldn't > produce a superior print with that system than I could with my 2200 > and custom profiles. I don't agree at all that the 3800 produces > inferior prints to the 2200 in any way other than EEM. And I seriously > doubt you'll get any response of consequence from Epson regarding this > letter. Most people find the Epson supplied profiles for this printer > to be pretty good. There are also a large number of people who have > been quite successful in making B/W prints with the ABW driver. > > If you want better B/W I think you should be looking at 3rd party B/W > specific inks ala Piezography or MIS. Which aren't really available > for the 3800 yet, but may be in a few months. > > --- > Derek > > blogging at: http://derekealy.com/WordPress > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "digikdm" > <monroekd@> wrote: > > > > I have been printing with my new Epson 3800 for about 1 month, and I > > am a bit dismayed that the B&W prints I'm getting using the intrinsic > > Epson driver (with or without third party profiles provided by Eric > > Chan) are inferior to the B&W prints I get using ImagePrint with my > > Epson 2200 printer. Admittedly, the prints are far superior to the > > intrinsic Epson driver for the 2200, but I would have thought that > > after 3-4 years of R&D, you guys would have figured out why ImagePrint > > is so superior to your driver. Also I have found that the color > > profiles provided in the driver vary in their quality. You guys are > > apparently aware of this situation, since you are offering the Bill > > Atkinson 7600/9600 profiles on your website and state that "in most > > cases, these custom ICC profiles will provide much better color and > > black and white print quality than with the standard profiles already > > shipping with every printer". I don't understand why it is so > > difficult for a company that is totally devoted to printing to create > > the best possible canned profiles for their own printers and papers. > > You would likely prevent numerous defectors to third party papers, if > > you created the best possible profiles for your own papers. If one > > spends >$1000 for a printer, they should not then have to scour the > > internet for profiles or third party drivers to get the best possible > > prints. The Bill Atkinson profiles do not work well for the 3800, and > > thus the 3800 users are left out in the cold for accurate color > profiles. > > I have also found it confusing that you have discontinued Epson > > Enhanced matte and Archival Matte > > papers and yet these profiles are still in the driver software. If the > > Ultrapremium presentation matte is the same as Ep Enhanced which I > > thought was the same as Archival matte, then why are there separate > > profiles in the driver for Enhanced matte and Archival matte? The > > profile/paper combo for premium luster is superior to that for the > > Enhanced matte profile/ultrapremium presentation matte paper combo, > > but both could be improved. > > The enhanced matte profile in concert with Ultrapremium presentation > > matte paper is particularly poor with muddy/blocked-up shadow areas. > > Perhaps you should pay Bill Atkinson to create some color profiles for > > the 3800 or better yet, Epson should purchase Colorbyte. > > Thanks > > Kevin Monroe > > >
Message
Re: Letter to Epson
2008-05-12 by steveabrink
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.