Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Letter to Epson

2008-05-12 by Steven Karafyllakis

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "alankushnir"  
Alan;

From what I can see of the 3800 feed mechanism; Epson simply scaled up 
the design of the smaller machines. Some things scale up well, others 
do not, or at least only scale well to a certain point. I honestly feel 
the 3800 is 'pushing it' too far, and yes, I do think it is at least a 
design weakness if not an outright flaw. And my experience is not 
unique, there were a number of complaints on this list when the first 
units started arriving back at the beginning of 2007. And yes, there 
are kludges and work-arounds, I'm intimately familiar with all of 
them,but I feel I shouldn't have to resort to that. C'mon, Alan-why 
should a $95.00 R2600 work flawlessly, while the $1200.00 3800. needs 
babying?

Steven Karafyllakis

>Your experience with the 3800 is
> not representative i.e, you imply there is a defect in the design of
> the printer. There would be far more complaints such as yours on this
> and other lists if that were the case.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.