Paul Thanks for your reply. Some small replies and questions. > One could put sepia in > the Y position and have about the same useable gamut as the UT2. An > additional difference, however, is that the cool UT14 toner is not as > cold as the UT2 toner. But the extreme coldness the UT2 could > achieve was not particularly useful and made profiling more difficult. OK - this sounds good. You are right, I didn't use the blue end of UT2 when I had it. Would a UT2 Yellow position ink be the right sepia ink to get? As far as I remember this was the sepia one. > Note also that the 1400 prints Eboni black only even smoother than the >1800. For making the most archival prints, this may be a useful additional >ability of the machine. It also works well with Eboni-6 for those >interested in a smoother 100% carbon pigment solution. This smoothness and the extra ability here is very convincing! > The 220 was a dye printer also, and it was reliable. I think Epson > took care of the 1280/90 clogging problem on all printers after that > date. > I forgot the 220 was a dye printer. I never used it for anything but UT3D, and it has performed well for over 2 years now. Given that I have had the 220 and a C86 (with EZ ink in it) perform well for 2 years +, sometimes also with long times of disuse, does indeed indicate that the reliability is sorted out. Any gaps in a nozzle check are swiftly dealt with by a few cleaning cycles. Also, I don't think you see so many "clog from hell" posts on the list as in previous years. On a side note, one thing I have found is that sometimes the colour balance drifts on the 220 and the C86, usually after they have sat unused for a while. A set of cleaning cycles (max 3 usually) is enough to bring it back correct again. I suppose this is to be expected - if you leave the printer for a while, the ink settles and does not all come back at the same rate when you use the printer. The cleaning pulls the ink through and gets the colour back to spec. > > > If UT14 is as easy to > > manage as UT3D then this will be great news. > > It's easier. The 3D space is harder to profile. Sounds good indeed. I'm looking forward to playing with UT14, and getting the means of good quality A3 printing back. I think I had better order the inks quickly before the pound slides any more against the dollar! Thanks again Steve
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Customising UT14 and Qs about UT14 in general
2008-08-15 by Steve Taylor
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.