Copyright issues are fairly straight forward and then again not, but to say that the term giclee is to inkjet as big mac is to burger is so far off to be really sad. One should not confuse the marketing by a group with a readily used term. There has certainly been a movement to stand up and call an inkjet an "inkjet" with pride but there are many out there that are still calling inkjet prints "Giclee" in order to improve the perception of them in the market place. There is NOTHING to impart quality either way; that only comes from the actual piece of paper and ink. If you want to call your coffee table book a collection of giclee prints that is nothing stopping you from doing so. Eric Neilsen Photo 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214 827-8301 http://ericneilsenphotography.com SKype ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of djon43 Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 12:43 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital prints? Everybody here knows "Giclee" is a marketing system and bogus label, not a process. And it's a copywrite violation to use the term if one isn't paying to take part in the hustle. "Giclee" is exactly the same conceptually as "Big Mac"...not a burger, a specific brand of burger.. inferior and easily marketed. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-20 by E Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.