Peter De Smidt wrote: > With traditional pigments, the pigment is suspended in a binder, and > it's this binder which holds the pigment on the substrate. Change over > time can happen with any element. I.e. the substrate can deteriorate, > the binder can deteriorate, or the pigment can change. With current > computerized ink printing, doesn't the coating on the paper act as the > binder? Are there any issues with these coatings breaking down over time? > There's still PVA in the inkjet binder how little that binder may be compared to non-inkjet inks. The paper coating will contain PVA as well but the coating particles will bind the ink with their structure as well. As many inkjet papers are waterfast today I think there will be a some hardening happen in the drying process so plain PVA it isn't. Wilhelm doesn't test print's abrasion resistance or folding strength but test like that are quite common in conventional print testing. I must have seen some inkjet test results on that subject too but can not recall it. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Binder question
2008-11-03 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.