Digital BW, The Print

Thanks.  It's odd that luster does so much better than Epson semi-matte.  

It's too bad, too- I don't really like the luster surface- to me it
looks "wet" with the K3 inks.  I much prefer Epson premium semi-matte,
Harman FB Al, Innova white semi-matte 300, etc.

Roger
 
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
<pr_roark@...> wrote:
>
> >...
> > Epson Premium Luster: acidic surface, basic base
> ...
> 
> Take a look at the B&W ratings Wilhelm gives Epson Premium Luster in 
> his latest tests, for example 
> http://www.wilhelm-research.com/epson/11880.html 
> 
> The B&W display for Premium Luster -- bare bulb (no glass) -- is >315 
> years.  Nothing else is close for that bare bulb category.  (Color is 
> 45 years for that paper bare bulb.)
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>