Harvey, When a picture is reproduced in a magazine with a 4 color process, we do not say "Hey great 4 color printing press picture". That would be absurd. We say "Hey dude, great image". When I go to a gallery and look at a great image, irregardless of how it was created it is the photograph that is whats important. Yes, we may want to know the process, but I don't care what the machine was the printed it. We don't say, "Hey dude, great point source enlarger print" Or "Great diffusion enlarger w/ #2-1/2 filter print do we?" Of course not, that would be too foolish. So why do we need to call a print by the machine that makes it. If a "traditional" print is made on an enlarger, it is the paper and coating that is described as in "Silver Gelatin Print". So I would suggest that my prints are "Pigmented Carbon Ink Prints". Who gives a sows ear wht the machine was that got the coating on the paper. A platinum print is not called "A #3 artists brush coated print" no it is a Platinum print because the media which is platinum/palladium in on the paper. I think this discussion has gotten way to anal. We are artists, we make art, let's forget about the machine, otherwise we will be calling our prints, "Diffusion light source w/ 2-1/2 contrast filter Prints". Mike
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Running into inkjet work....
2002-02-14 by Michael Kravit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.