Gerry, It is true that I can get great detail out of my 4800 dpi scanner. The problem is that I cannot do the, at times, extreme burning and dodging that some of my prints need. In photoshop, I can't burn a bright area to dark without introducing too much noise. Also, a scan from a print can look smoother, more creamy in side by side comparisons. I'm a people photographer so that is a plus. If it is an Andreas Gursky style image, stick with the neg scanner. Frank --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > But don't you have a detail problem? No print can hold a tenth the detail of film! > > I know you can get good scans IF you have a perfect print, but you'd still be losing a lot of detail, no? > > Jerry > > culturalvisions wrote: > > > I don't think we should automatically assume that a negative > > scanner makes a better inkjet print than a flatbed scan from a > > glossy silver print. > > > > See Ralph Gibson's interview in the Feb. Shutterbug for his > > support of flatbed scanning. > > > > My pro scanner friend with a Scitek scanner is always telling me > > to bring him prints rather than negs as he can do a better job > > with them. > > > > My own experience with a Minolta Pro indicates that my little > > Epson flatbed 636 makes better scans from b/w prints than the > > $3000 Minolta can do from the same 6X7 and 645 negatives. > > The negative scanner introduces too much grain aliasing into > > the equation. > > > > Frank > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "dellaellingson" > > <dellaellingson@y...> wrote: > > > Thanks Martin. > > > > > > -Della > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" > > <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > > > > Della, > > > > > > > > Check out both these sites. Especially the second one as > > this gives some of > > > > the workflow. > > > > > > > > http://www.lenswork.com/index2.html > > > > > > > > http://www.danburkholder.com/ > > > > > > > > If you give any of this a try, please share your experiences. I > > would like > > > > to more than just inkjet info on the list. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "dellaellingson" <dellaellingson@y...> > > > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:15 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanning b&w prints > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin, > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the web address for Lenswork's Special > > Editions? I am > > > > interested to know more about this. > > > > > > > > > > -Della > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" > > > > <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > > > > > > David, > > > > > > > > > > > > Scanning prints is a legit method of getting your photos > > into digital > > > > form. > > > > > > The "Special Edition" silver fiber prints sold by Lenswork > > are produce > > > > using > > > > > > this method (although I believe they use a drum > > scanner). The selected > > > > > > prints are scanned and the resulting file is output on a > > 3600 dpi image > > > > > > setter to make contact negatives. > > > > > > > > > > > > The results are excellent and I cannot distinguish them > > from an enlarged > > > > > > silver print. I have a Jay Dussard and a Bruce Barnbaum > > print. Excellent > > > > > > prints. Anyone wanting to produce silver prints from their > > digital files > > > > > > should check this out. > > > > > > > > > > > > Having said all that I would still recommend that > > scanning the original > > > > > > negatives as the best way to reduce the number of > > reproduction steps, > > > > since > > > > > > there is lose of information each time an image is > > duplicated. The loss, > > > > as > > > > > > you say, may be so small that it is not noticeable. You > > would really > > > > have to > > > > > > do a side-by-side of finished prints produced by both > > methods to know > > > > for > > > > > > sure. > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin Wesley > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: <daschkenas@a...> > > > > > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:30 PM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanning b&w prints > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With all of the talk about film scanners, thought I would > > share what > > > > I'm > > > > > > doing. I've been flatbed scanning b&w prints ,( from the > > past 25 years) > > > > > > with a UMAX Mirage SEII, both 8x10 and 11x14 inch prints > > as it will scan > > > > > > print sizes up to 12 x 17. I am scanning so that I print at a > > minimum > > > > of > > > > > > 300 dpi. I'm making mostly 15 inch wide prints, from > > prints done in > > > > various > > > > > > formats thru the years, 35mm, 2,1/4, and 4x5 & 8x10 > > contact prints... I > > > > am > > > > > > getting, which I believe, is great quality. In most cases I > > like the > > > > inkjet > > > > > > print better than the original, and I am a very good wet > > print maker. > > > > > > People are telling me that I am sacrificing quality by > > scanning prints, > > > > but > > > > > > quite frankly I know that should be the case, but I can't > > imagine seeing > > > > any > > > > > > more detail in the print than I am seeing now. ( I sent a > > few prints to > > > > > > Jerry Olson to view and I don't believe that he would have > > known the > > > > prints > > > > > > were done by scanning a print rather than a negative.) > > > > > > > It is much easier for me to access the prints rather than > > search thru > > > > 25 > > > > > > years worth of negatives, which is the main reason I'm > > doing it this > > > > way, > > > > > > also, tho because the prints look so darn good. > > > > > > > So for those of you wanting to convert prints that you > > have on hand, > > > > don't > > > > > > overlook flatbed scanning, you don't need that $5000.00 > > scanner to > > > > produce > > > > > > great looking work. > > > > > > > I'm printing b&w with a 1280, CIS and MIS 6 color dyes > > on LPM. > > > > > > > David Aschkenas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, > > Bookmarks, Polls > > > > and > > > > > > other resources as they are often being updated. The > > page is at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > > > > > > - Include your full name with your message. > > > > > > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > > > > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier > > messages to > > > > keep > > > > > > them short. > > > > > > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change > > the subject > > > > header. > > > > > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal > > attacks or > > > > "flames." > > > > > > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > > > > > > - Before posting a question, search the message > > archives and the > > > > various > > > > > > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, > > Bookmarks, Polls and > > > > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is > > at: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > > > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > > > > - Include your full name with your message. > > > > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier > > messages to keep > > > > them short. > > > > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the > > subject header. > > > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal > > attacks or "flames." > > > > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > > > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives > > and the various > > > > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanning b&w prints
2002-02-14 by culturalvisions
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.