The only (potential) problem here is the quality of the print (person printing?). If one were able to get all of the information from the neg onto the print, that would be great. However, a long time ago when I took a Yosemite Workshop with Ansel Adams, he said that a very good printer (were talking about people here, not machines) with an excellent negative could produce a print with 72 discernable tones from black to white. Given that we are working with 256 values in the digital form and that a good scanner can produce a very wide tonal range, I am wondering about the comparison of print v negative scanning. Personally, I can produce an inkjet print from a film scan that is superior (i.e. subtle detail in highlight and shadows) to a silver print from the same neg. I consider myself (pat on back here) a pretty good silver printer but since I've gone digital, I haven't made a silver print.the inkjet stuff is too good. Stan Shire Associate Professor/Department Chair Photographic Imaging Community College of Philadelphia Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E. 215 751-8320 <mailto:sshire@...> sshire@... -----Original Message----- From: culturalvisions [mailto:frank@...] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:01 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanning b&w prints I don't think we should automatically assume that a negative scanner makes a better inkjet print than a flatbed scan from a glossy silver print. See Ralph Gibson's interview in the Feb. Shutterbug for his support of flatbed scanning. My pro scanner friend with a Scitek scanner is always telling me to bring him prints rather than negs as he can do a better job with them. My own experience with a Minolta Pro indicates that my little Epson flatbed 636 makes better scans from b/w prints than the $3000 Minolta can do from the same 6X7 and 645 negatives. The negative scanner introduces too much grain aliasing into the equation. Frank --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "dellaellingson" <dellaellingson@y...> wrote: > Thanks Martin. > > -Della > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > > Della, > > > > Check out both these sites. Especially the second one as this gives some of > > the workflow. > > > > http://www.lenswork.com/index2.html > > > > http://www.danburkholder.com/ > > > > If you give any of this a try, please share your experiences. I would like > > to more than just inkjet info on the list. > > > > Thanks, > > Martin > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "dellaellingson" <dellaellingson@y...> > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:15 PM > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanning b&w prints > > > > > > > Martin, > > > > > > Do you have the web address for Lenswork's Special Editions? I am > > interested to know more about this. > > > > > > -Della > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" > > <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > > > > David, > > > > > > > > Scanning prints is a legit method of getting your photos into digital > > form. > > > > The "Special Edition" silver fiber prints sold by Lenswork are produce > > using > > > > this method (although I believe they use a drum scanner). The selected > > > > prints are scanned and the resulting file is output on a 3600 dpi image > > > > setter to make contact negatives. > > > > > > > > The results are excellent and I cannot distinguish them from an enlarged > > > > silver print. I have a Jay Dussard and a Bruce Barnbaum print. Excellent > > > > prints. Anyone wanting to produce silver prints from their digital files > > > > should check this out. > > > > > > > > Having said all that I would still recommend that scanning the original > > > > negatives as the best way to reduce the number of reproduction steps, > > since > > > > there is lose of information each time an image is duplicated. The loss, > > as > > > > you say, may be so small that it is not noticeable. You would really > > have to > > > > do a side-by-side of finished prints produced by both methods to know > > for > > > > sure. > > > > > > > > Martin Wesley > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: <daschkenas@a...> > > > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:30 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanning b&w prints > > > > > > > > > > > > > With all of the talk about film scanners, thought I would share what > > I'm > > > > doing. I've been flatbed scanning b&w prints ,( from the past 25 years) > > > > with a UMAX Mirage SEII, both 8x10 and 11x14 inch prints as it will scan > > > > print sizes up to 12 x 17. I am scanning so that I print at a minimum > > of > > > > 300 dpi. I'm making mostly 15 inch wide prints, from prints done in > > various > > > > formats thru the years, 35mm, 2,1/4, and 4x5 & 8x10 contact prints... I > > am > > > > getting, which I believe, is great quality. In most cases I like the > > inkjet > > > > print better than the original, and I am a very good wet print maker. > > > > People are telling me that I am sacrificing quality by scanning prints, > > but > > > > quite frankly I know that should be the case, but I can't imagine seeing > > any > > > > more detail in the print than I am seeing now. ( I sent a few prints to > > > > Jerry Olson to view and I don't believe that he would have known the > > prints > > > > were done by scanning a print rather than a negative.) > > > > > It is much easier for me to access the prints rather than search thru > > 25 > > > > years worth of negatives, which is the main reason I'm doing it this > > way, > > > > also, tho because the prints look so darn good. > > > > > So for those of you wanting to convert prints that you have on hand, > > don't > > > > overlook flatbed scanning, you don't need that $5000.00 scanner to > > produce > > > > great looking work. > > > > > I'm printing b&w with a 1280, CIS and MIS 6 color dyes on LPM. > > > > > David Aschkenas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls > > and > > > > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > > > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > > > > - Include your full name with your message. > > > > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > > keep > > > > them short. > > > > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject > > header. > > > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > > "flames." > > > > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > > > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the > > various > > > > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > > - Include your full name with your message. > > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > > them short. > > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanning b&w prints
2002-02-14 by Shire,Stanley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.