John, > Never heard of 2-prrolidone. and Triethanolamine. You can Google much of this and get a picture of what they are doing. > And there is a chemical called Alkyldiol, that they describe > as Proprietary. That sounds mysterious. It accounts for 7.5% All the really secret stuff is hidden from view. Note the small amount of carbon. Then go and compare their color pigment MSDS. Where is the pigment? Hmm ... > wetting agent? You don't need much wetting agent at all -- like 1%. In my C6 formula the Photo Flo is 10%, but that's becuase it's mostly water and glycol. It's there for the glycol as much as the weak wetting agent. >... water making up 80% and the Carbon pigment less than 1% ... Expensive water. > So, if you take the HP gray dilute it with gyclol, > distilled water, and a wetting agent, that's it? I tend toward more glycerol and less glycol (like the Epson glop) -- better specific gravity and lower clogging from what I can see. > I wonder why so much of that Alkyldiol is necessary? I think that is a generic description and where they are hiding the color pigs as well as other components they don't want to disclose, (but it's been a while and I'm answering without going back to my notes). Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Low gamut pigments
2009-08-09 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.