Steve, I tried the epson ink in BO, and wasn't even close to happy. But I have been able to get very usable digital negs. I've been been printing silver based images 40 years and carbon prints for almost 15 years and I have never seen any digital prints that I was happy with. I'm sure there are some that have gotten the digital print to the point that it is very hard to tell them apart. From what I can read and from talking with folks the biggest problem with clogs I CIS, I am going to use new empty carts and see what happens. I'll just have to try some different papers. I make my own paper for my carbon prints so I'll give it a try also. Water issues force me into this corner, so it's either try digital prints or quit photography and that ain't gonna happen. I'm trying to keep a open mind, I'll give it a couple of years. Dennis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, deandadin@... wrote: > > Hello, I used to have the 2200 printer and I did B&W printing from scanned > negs and digital output. I was able to get acceptable B&W prints using the > regular Epson inks for the 2200. You will never get fantastic B&W prints > from the 2200 no matter what inks you use. They will be OK at best but you > cant compare them to regular silver prints. I printed on many papers > including Japanese Gampi tissue paper and the results are interesting but if you > put a digital print next to a silver print you will choose the silver print > in a second. I now have the Epson 3800 printer and I can say the same. > Digital prints have a digital look to them. I can get some pretty good quality > out of the 3800 but I would not sell an exhibition quality digital print for > the same price I can sell a silver print. I am printing on the Epson > silver fiber type digital media now and it still has that digital look to it. I > have been printing silver prints for 30 years and I teach both digital and > silver printing and it is clear that digital B&W printing has a way to go > yet. If you use one of the glossy silver type digital papers they will have > that bronzing look to them with the 2200. If you use a matt paper there > will not be bronzing but you will have muddy shadow detail. One big problem > with using the off brand inks is that the 2200 can have clogging problems. I > have not used off brand inks in the 2200 because I found that the 2200 > worked pretty well with the standard Epson inks. I was never really happy with > digital B&W because of my silver background and I still am not that happy > with the prints that I can do with the 3800. My students go ohh and ahh when > I show them my digital B&W prints but the ohhs and ahhs stop when I show > my silver prints at the same time. The silver prints blow away any digital > print that I can do. There is no comparing the two types of prints. You must > calibrate your monitor no matter what. Any of the spider type calibration > units work fine. Get one in the 175.00 range. I hope that this is a help for > you. Steve > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Probably another dumb question, But!
2009-09-03 by baecht1
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.