Mike, thanks for that comparative report. I hadn't thought of the paper path difference. Regarding the inks: What's to stop one from using them in the Epson if they are indeed superior - or are they? Are LF different than UV (that were used in this exhibit with incredible archival claims)? Antonis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Michael Kravit" <michael.kravit@w...> wrote: The Epson 10000 print qualty exceeds the HP > 5000 and Epson 9000. Second, the HP 5000 does not have a straight through > paper path. Using sheets like Hahnemuhle William Turner, Torchon, and German > Etching Board is near impossible. Using roll paper becomes imperative. > Sheets are too stiff and get runied in the 5000. > > The good part is that the HP LF inks are excellent.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson vs HP for fine art bw???
2002-02-17 by antonisphoto
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.