> > There is definitely some trial and error. After printing a step wedge test > file, scan it. Use levels to put the 0% and 100% where they should be. > Then read the values of the other patches. If, for example, the 95% patch > reads 97%, try putting a 94 in the 95% box of the Transfer Function. (It > tends to overshoot.) Then print with it and see what happened. A couple of questions about transfer functions. Once a transfer function is set in the page setup dialog box, does it get saved with the file, or does it stay active for all other prints as well. One disadvantage I see to a transfer function is that it is buried away on a second page the Page Setup window, so one may forget if it is on or off. In light of that, is it in anyway preferable to a luminosity adjustment layer curve? I like the idea of an adjustment layer because of it's visibility, and with PS6 we can group such a layer with one of Paul's tone curves as a layer set. Such a set can be aptly named, and easily monitored, in a way I find difficult with transfer curves. I guess it's really moot in the end as a transfer curve can be loaded as an adjustment layer curve, and vice versa. So people could apply the same curve through either method. I just wonder what is the preference for the transfer approach? Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 4 Paul Roark: MIS VM and Piezo Questions
2001-08-20 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.