Frank, I am assuming this is an hourly rental or a day structure; 1/2 or full day. Besides the scanning time, are you also being charged to write your files to your own media? or are you hooking up your own external drive? Did you give your self some test files to play with at various setting keeping the scanned area at the same ppi? This allows you to run a few sets of tests to see what those scan software setting are doing to your images. I remember it (-120) being the actual off setting or true 0. I typically give my self a little above and below clipping points dmax and dmin, and highly recommend it on a rented scanner to avoid clipping. See what they have defaults set to but you don't want to waste time rescanning only because you clipped your detail some place. Eric Neilsen Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 www.ericneilsenphotography.com skype me with ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of frankg_photo Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 8:18 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning B We live and learn. I rented time and the scans are ok, but not great. I'll do better next time now that I'm more familiar with the interface and will be less panicked about maximizing my rental time at the lab. I could use a little more clarification from users please: Re: USM at -120 I had the usm palette boxes all set to 0 (one of the usm settings, I forget which, kept defaulting to 1) and indeed the grain is pronounced in some negs. Is -120 a general consensus done by empirical testing, or a rcommendation by flexcolor ? Using photokit after - do you change mode to rgb> select Capture sharpeer>35 fast negative (as appropriate) > medium edge sharpen (as appropriate ? AF icon (auto focus?) - there is a little AF icon/button - should this be 'dark' or 'light/faded' ? Some scans appear a tad soft? Gamma - is there a place to set this to 2.2 ? I used the levels histogram, and found that the A (auto) worked well to bring the white and black points to the edges of the histogram. I could manually change them as well as the midpoint. And I could also change the midtones with Gradations/curves. But...my scans are still mostly too light and flat. I selected Greyscale 16 bit B&W negative. I figured that the film grain would overide a bit of noise and the benefit of rgb. The files were 100mb anyway as GS. What is the maximum Optical (non interpolated) res of the Imacon (848) - I used 6300ppi. Unfortunately there was no-one to train me just a young person that clearly didn't know the answers to any of this. Thanks for any further clarification. Frank --- In DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Paul Kohl <pkohl@...> wrote: > > I use an Imacon Flextight regularly and have done tests on black and > white negative scanning. My results are that scanning as a greyscale > positive gets me the most efficient and tonally comprehensive scans, > as another poster recommended. One important thing is to set the > Texture/Unsharp masking sharpening setting to -120 or else the > software will sharpen the image. This sharpening will increase grain > presence in the image. > I sharpen later in PS using the Photokit sharpened plug-in. > The Imacon is a great machine. > Good luck with it. > Paul > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning B
2010-01-24 by E.Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.