Yes, it's an hourly rental.And yes, all time is charged including writing the files (to cd). "-120 being the actual off setting or true 0" - I wonder if anyone with an Imacon (848) and Flexcolor 4.6 can verify this? "a little above and below clipping points dmax and dmin" - do you mean to keep the triangles a little off the edge of the histogram ? Is there a place to set the gamma/midpoints other than the middle triangle of the histogram ? Frank --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "E.Neilsen" <e.neilsen2@...> wrote: > > Frank, I am assuming this is an hourly rental or a day structure; 1/2 or > full day. Besides the scanning time, are you also being charged to write > your files to your own media? or are you hooking up your own external drive? > Did you give your self some test files to play with at various setting > keeping the scanned area at the same ppi? This allows you to run a few sets > of tests to see what those scan software setting are doing to your images. > > > > > > I remember it (-120) being the actual off setting or true 0. I typically > give my self a little above and below clipping points dmax and dmin, and > highly recommend it on a rented scanner to avoid clipping. See what they > have defaults set to but you don't want to waste time rescanning only > because you clipped your detail some place. > > > > Eric Neilsen > > Eric Neilsen Photography > > 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 > > Dallas, TX 75226 > > > > www.ericneilsenphotography.com > > skype me with ejprinter > > > > _____ > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > frankg_photo > Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 8:18 AM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning B > > > > > > We live and learn. > I rented time and the scans are ok, but not great. > I'll do better next time now that I'm more familiar with the interface and > will be less panicked about maximizing my rental time at the lab. I could > use a little more clarification from users please: > > Re: USM at -120 > I had the usm palette boxes all set to 0 (one of the usm settings, I forget > which, kept defaulting to 1) and indeed the grain is pronounced in some > negs. > Is -120 a general consensus done by empirical testing, or a rcommendation by > flexcolor ? > > Using photokit after - do you change mode to rgb> select Capture sharpeer>35 > fast negative (as appropriate) > medium edge sharpen (as appropriate ? > > AF icon (auto focus?) - there is a little AF icon/button - should this be > 'dark' or 'light/faded' ? Some scans appear a tad soft? > > Gamma - is there a place to set this to 2.2 ? > > I used the levels histogram, and found that the A (auto) worked well to > bring the white and black points to the edges of the histogram. I could > manually change them as well as the midpoint. And I could also change the > midtones with Gradations/curves. But...my scans are still mostly too light > and flat. > > I selected Greyscale 16 bit B&W negative. I figured that the film grain > would overide a bit of noise and the benefit of rgb. The files were 100mb > anyway as GS. > > What is the maximum Optical (non interpolated) res of the Imacon (848) - I > used 6300ppi. > > Unfortunately there was no-one to train me just a young person that clearly > didn't know the answers to any of this. > > Thanks for any further clarification. > Frank > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhit > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Paul Kohl <pkohl@> wrote: > > > > I use an Imacon Flextight regularly and have done tests on black and > > white negative scanning. My results are that scanning as a greyscale > > positive gets me the most efficient and tonally comprehensive scans, > > as another poster recommended. One important thing is to set the > > Texture/Unsharp masking sharpening setting to -120 or else the > > software will sharpen the image. This sharpening will increase grain > > presence in the image. > > I sharpen later in PS using the Photokit sharpened plug-in. > > The Imacon is a great machine. > > Good luck with it. > > Paul > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Scanning B&W
2010-01-24 by frankg_photo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.