Hi Paul, back in the days of B&W, I used either Triton X-100 or Igepal 630, never had a problem - I left out the propylene glycol. I usually prepare an aliquot if the Triton and just used a several drops per liter, knowing the ration of my preparation. ----- pr_roark wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -= Chris =- wrote: > > > > PhotoFlo is nothing but a cheap wetting agent. ... > > The MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheets) are a very good way to find out what things are. Here is the guts of the Kodak Photo Flo 200 MSDS: > > http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/PF200.jpg > > Photo Flo 200 is 60 - 70% water, 25 - 30% propylene glycol, and 5 - 10% a proprietary surfactant. > > Some of the nice things about Photo Flo 200 are that it's readily available and has been used with imaging substrates for years. The glycol is a significant part of the ink base, and PF200 is a convenient way to get it. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Edwal LFN & Photo-Flo 200 for UK and EU users - call for interest
2010-01-28 by -= Chris =-
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.