Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Metamerism 4 George Kunze

Re: [Digital BW] Metamerism 4 George Kunze

2001-08-21 by Steadman Uhlich

George, 
I will probably go the same way.  Thinking alike here.  Is the 1270 faster than the 1200.  I think the 1200 seems very slow compared to the 1160.   Would like to communicate with you offline about another issue too.  Steadmanuhlich@....  Send me your email if you will. 

Steadman
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: toomagenta@... 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 3:17 PM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Metamerism


  Steadman,
  Thanks for your reply. I had a 1200 once and the 1270 really made mince meat 
  of it. If the cone inks were working with the 1270 or 80 I'd be there. I 
  understand there are issues, and I need a commercial printer. I do a lot of 
  volume. I may just dedicate an 1160 to MIS variables with a cone driver for 
  my sepia, and use a 1280 with cone color for color. Thanks again
  George Kunze

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  If you do not wish to belong to Digital B&W, The Print, you may
  unsubscribe by sending an email to:
  DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Metamerism 4 George Kunze

2001-08-21 by wparsons@evergreen-funds.com

Steadman,
The 1270 is at least twice as fast as the 1200, had m-u-c-h more detail,
and is QUIET! in comparison.  I, too, am waiting for a Cone CIS and inks.
The 2000 has lesser detail than the 1270 and also lesser gamut from the
pigment inks.
Bill

From Steadman Uhlich:
>I will probably go the same way.  Thinking alike here.  Is the 1270 faster
than the 1200.  I think the 1200 seems very slow compared to the 1160.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.