Re: [Digital BW] Re: Dynamic Range Definitions and Print Tones
2002-03-30 by Martin Wesley
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "gulstenek" <kevin@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 5:55 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Dynamic Range Definitions and Print Tones > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Austin Franklin" > <darkroom@i...> wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > > > > > I don't believe that lowers the dynamic range of the print...it > > > is what it > > > > is. The dynamic range YOU can perceive is lower, no doubt. > > > > > > > When you say "it is what it is" do you mean that given a set of > > > increasingly > > > accurate measuring devices there will be a point where the next > most > > > accurate device will not yield a result different from its > predecessor? > > > > Yes, that's an interesting way to put it! > > > > > Also, how do you deal with the increasingly precise measurement > when the > > > precision of the measurements starts to exceeds 2x (or is it 1/2) > the > > > physical characteristics of that which you are measuring (ink > droplets, > > > silver grains etc. > > > > I don't quite get what you mean here... > > > I'm not surprised. For some reason I started getting confused > between precision of density measurement and the size of the area > being sampled. Erroneously thinking that the measurment had to be > smaller to be better. Hence the reference to physical size. > Kevin, You were perhaps sneaking up on the idea of a continuous system. Definition 2 below. Continuous: 1 : marked by uninterrupted extension in space, time, or sequence 2 of a function : having the property that the absolute value of the numerical difference between the value at a given point and the value at any point in a neighborhood of the given point can be made as close to zero as desired by choosing the neighborhood small enough Martin