Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by Steadman Uhlich

Hello Mike, 
Congrats on getting in the exhibition. 

Good luck on the DigitalPlatinum too.

Steadman
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Michael J. Kravit 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:14 PM
  Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum



  I was wondering if anyone would object to the discussion of making 
  digital negatives for silver and platinum printing. I know that we very 
  often get into long and detailed discussions on inks and printers, but I 
  would thing that the production of digital negatives made on ink jet 
  printers might be appropriate.

  I would be interested in what others are doing, their work flows, their 
  successes and their failures.

  My platinum darkroom is just about complete. I am waiting for the sink 
  and UV exposure vacuum frame to be delivered in the next couple of 
  weeks.  In the meantime I am beginning to experiment with digital 
  negatives.

  On another note, if anyone will be passing through the West Palm Beach 
  International Airport, there will be a 4 month exhibition of art  based 
  upon the theme "Florida Fauna".  I have had two 18"x18" carbon pigment 
  prints selected as part of the exhibition. They were printed on the 
  Epson 7000 using MIS FS quads and the Image print IP4 RIP.

  Mike


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by mkravit

Thanks Steadman.

You have been very quiet latley.

Mike

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Steadman Uhlich" 
<steadmanuhlich@k...> wrote:
> Hello Mike, 
> Congrats on getting in the exhibition. 
> 
> Good luck on the DigitalPlatinum too.
> 
> Steadman
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Michael J. Kravit 
>   To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y... 
>   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:14 PM
>   Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum
> 
> 
> 
>   I was wondering if anyone would object to the discussion of 
making 
>   digital negatives for silver and platinum printing. I know that 
we very 
>   often get into long and detailed discussions on inks and 
printers, but I 
>   would thing that the production of digital negatives made on ink 
jet 
>   printers might be appropriate.
> 
>   I would be interested in what others are doing, their work 
flows, their 
>   successes and their failures.
> 
>   My platinum darkroom is just about complete. I am waiting for 
the sink 
>   and UV exposure vacuum frame to be delivered in the next couple 
of 
>   weeks.  In the meantime I am beginning to experiment with 
digital 
>   negatives.
> 
>   On another note, if anyone will be passing through the West Palm 
Beach 
>   International Airport, there will be a 4 month exhibition of 
art  based 
>   upon the theme "Florida Fauna".  I have had two 18"x18" carbon 
pigment 
>   prints selected as part of the exhibition. They were printed on 
the 
>   Epson 7000 using MIS FS quads and the Image print IP4 RIP.
> 
>   Mike
> 
> 
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>              
>        
>        
> 
>   Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page 
is at:
> 
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
>   Please follow these basic guidelines:
>   - Include your full name with your message.
>   - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
>   - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep them short.
>   - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the 
subject header.
>   - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks 
or "flames."
>   - Complete your Yahoo profile.
>   - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service. 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by Steadman Uhlich

Paul and Mike, 

I completely agree with Paul's points below and have an interest in the same end-results.  

Nicely put Paul.  

Steadman
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Roark 
  To: DigitalB&WPrint 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:47 PM
  Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum


  Mike,

  I think it is very appropriate that digital negatives be discussed on this
  list.  In fact, I have had some contact with another list member who is
  interested in a dye-based, Piezo-compatible quad so that we could use the
  Piezo driver to output the digital negatives.  I think that could be a very
  interesting way to go if it works.

  I agree that the traditional -- silver and platinum -- prints are probably
  going to be preferred by a number of galleries and collectors for some time.

  Actually, I have something of an ulterior motive.  If we have a reasonable
  way to make the "traditional" products with our digital files, I think it'll
  focus the "anti-digital" arguments into the categories of, first, the
  objections based on longevity (really an objective problem we can deal with)
  and, second, those objections that are based on the mere fact of a digital
  step.  Frankly, I think a lot of the objections are in this category.
  However, if they can't tell the difference, and if we simply label out
  prints as "silver" or "platinum," it should make life a little more
  difficult for the anti-digital bigots.

  Paul
  http://www.PaulRoark.com





        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by Paul Roark

Mike,

I think it is very appropriate that digital negatives be discussed on this
list.  In fact, I have had some contact with another list member who is
interested in a dye-based, Piezo-compatible quad so that we could use the
Piezo driver to output the digital negatives.  I think that could be a very
interesting way to go if it works.

I agree that the traditional -- silver and platinum -- prints are probably
going to be preferred by a number of galleries and collectors for some time.

Actually, I have something of an ulterior motive.  If we have a reasonable
way to make the "traditional" products with our digital files, I think it'll
focus the "anti-digital" arguments into the categories of, first, the
objections based on longevity (really an objective problem we can deal with)
and, second, those objections that are based on the mere fact of a digital
step.  Frankly, I think a lot of the objections are in this category.
However, if they can't tell the difference, and if we simply label out
prints as "silver" or "platinum," it should make life a little more
difficult for the anti-digital bigots.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by mkravit

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:

>In fact, I have had some contact with another list member who is
>interested in a dye-based, Piezo-compatible quad so that we could 
>use the Piezo driver to output the digital negatives.  I think that 
>could be a very interesting way to go if it works.

Now that sounds very cool. However, can we obtain enough density for 
silver or yet worse platinum. In Burkholder's book he uses a 
colorized process using 0,55,55,0 to obtain an orange color to block 
UV light thus giving the negative greater density (although the 
negative appears to be very thin).

For Palladium/Platinum a density range of 1.8-1.95 is ideal. The use 
of restrainers to control contrast is not a wise solution as they 
result in image degredation through clumpy grain. Building a digital 
negative with the needed density results in eliminating the need for 
a contrast agent or restrainer.

> I agree that the traditional -- silver and platinum -- prints are 
>probably going to be preferred by a number of galleries and 
>collectors for some time.

Just the reality of the day.
 
> Actually, I have something of an ulterior motive.  If we have a 
>reasonable way to make the "traditional" products with our digital 
>files, I think it'll focus the "anti-digital" arguments into the 
>categories of, first, the objections based on longevity (really an 
>objective problem we can deal with)and, second, those objections 
>that are based on the mere fact of a digital step.  Frankly, I 
>think a lot of the objections are in this category.
>However, if they can't tell the difference, and if we simply label 
>out prints as "silver" or "platinum," it should make life a little 
>more difficult for the anti-digital bigots.

That is a nice way to put it, but you are really correct. The inkjet 
prints, although not proven yet, may in fact last longer than silver 
prints, are suffering from a certain amount of snob appeal.

Mike

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by lrryr@attbi.com

The only transparency material out there (that I know 
of) that will hold enough ink to get the density's 
needed is Pictorico OHP.

The problems are:

1. Zero dot gain, any inconsistancy in the printing 
sticks out like a sore thumb, the dither patterns (and 
the peizo pattern) are painfully apparent.

2. The dark end of the negative has an extreme image % 
vs print density curve that needs to be straightened. 
this is true with both the epson driver and the peizo 
driver. Applying a correction in curves with this 
results in noticeable posterization. If this could be 
handled in 16 bits in a rip, that may take care of it.

I'm glad to hear others are interested in pursueing this.

Be sure to visit Dan Burkholders site as well.

www.danburkholder.com

Larry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> I was wondering if anyone would object to the discussion of making 
> digital negatives for silver and platinum printing. I know that we very 
> often get into long and detailed discussions on inks and printers, but I 
> would thing that the production of digital negatives made on ink jet 
> printers might be appropriate.
> 
> I would be interested in what others are doing, their work flows, their 
> successes and their failures.
> 
> My platinum darkroom is just about complete. I am waiting for the sink 
> and UV exposure vacuum frame to be delivered in the next couple of 
> weeks.  In the meantime I am beginning to experiment with digital 
> negatives.
> 
> On another note, if anyone will be passing through the West Palm Beach 
> International Airport, there will be a 4 month exhibition of art  based 
> upon the theme "Florida Fauna".  I have had two 18"x18" carbon pigment 
> prints selected as part of the exhibition. They were printed on the 
> Epson 7000 using MIS FS quads and the Image print IP4 RIP.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other 
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them 
> short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various 
> resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
>

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by mkravit

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., lrryr@a... wrote:
> The only transparency material out there (that I know 
> of) that will hold enough ink to get the density's 
> needed is Pictorico OHP.
> 
> The problems are:
> 
> 1. Zero dot gain, any inconsistancy in the printing 
> sticks out like a sore thumb, the dither patterns (and 
> the peizo pattern) are painfully apparent.

Larry,

So what you are saying is that the ink does not spread amd absorb 
into the media to hide imperfections. I guess this is where the very 
small print head nozzles would be beneficial. 

A friend of mine is making 4x5 negatives on Pictorico OHP utilizing 
Berkholder's methods. There are two ways he makes desktop negatives. 
One is using color fill and the other is called something else. It 
is this second method that Tom says works the best. His 4x5 Platinum 
prints look as nice as his prints made from the duplicate negatives.

The texture and properties of the fine art watercolor papers that 
are coated with Platinum salts are much like the digital papers. The 
inherently hide the imperfections. The platinum process is self 
masking. That is the emulsion becomes less sensitive to exposure as 
time goes on. So it is possible to gain detail in the highlights 
without the risk of blocking up the shadow detail. I am not sure how 
this helps, but I thought I would throw it onto the table.

> 2. The dark end of the negative has an extreme image % 
> vs print density curve that needs to be straightened. 
> this is true with both the epson driver and the peizo 
> driver. Applying a correction in curves with this 
> results in noticeable posterization. If this could be 
> handled in 16 bits in a rip, that may take care of it.

I don't see why it could not. In fact, using CMYK inks to make the 
negatives as colorized monochrome images, a standard RIP could be 
used to take advantage of the RIPs dither, ink channel, reduction 
and adjustment capabilities.

> I'm glad to hear others are interested in pursueing this.

I think that unless someone is having great success with making 
negatives on a 1280, or 10000 and is willing to share the successes 
publicly, this may be a long arduous process.

I will eventually ask Martin and Antonis to include a digital 
negative section in the Files area as a database so that we can all 
share our triumphs and failures. 

Mike

Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by kdidhjhu

Book me in for an on going discussion of DigitalSilver/Platinum. Being able to produce wet prints from some 
sort of digtal file neg. would be a great help when it comes to the gallery thing. If we all start doing research 
and sharing the results we may end up with a great hybred. It also seems to me that the suppliers of 
traditional materials may also like to see this happen. 

This does not in anyway lessen my interest in the digital or inkjet print, it just seems to be another dimention 
to what can be obtained in the wet darkroom... that is for those of us, who still find a beautiful silver or 
platinum print a feast for the eye. And not to mention a much easier sell in the gallery environment for a least 
the time being.

Greg Edwards

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by lrryr@attbi.com

One other thing worth mentioning, I believe, but havnt 
substantiated, that the peizo inks are more opaque to uv 
than a densitometer will tell you. I've set my negatives 
density's to 1.0 or so on my densitometer and I believe 
I get pretty good range on my ziatypes. Unfortunately my 
time available for this is so sporadic I havnt arrived 
at any definite conclusions.

Also I've written an excel spreadsheet that does the 
nescessary interpolation for generating new transfer 
functions or curves after printing and reading a step 
wedge. I'll put it up on the web for download when I get 
home tonight.

Larry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., lrryr@a... wrote:
> > The only transparency material out there (that I know 
> > of) that will hold enough ink to get the density's 
> > needed is Pictorico OHP.
> > 
> > The problems are:
> > 
> > 1. Zero dot gain, any inconsistancy in the printing 
> > sticks out like a sore thumb, the dither patterns (and 
> > the peizo pattern) are painfully apparent.
> 
> Larry,
> 
> So what you are saying is that the ink does not spread amd absorb 
> into the media to hide imperfections. I guess this is where the very 
> small print head nozzles would be beneficial. 
> 
> A friend of mine is making 4x5 negatives on Pictorico OHP utilizing 
> Berkholder's methods. There are two ways he makes desktop negatives. 
> One is using color fill and the other is called something else. It 
> is this second method that Tom says works the best. His 4x5 Platinum 
> prints look as nice as his prints made from the duplicate negatives.
> 
> The texture and properties of the fine art watercolor papers that 
> are coated with Platinum salts are much like the digital papers. The 
> inherently hide the imperfections. The platinum process is self 
> masking. That is the emulsion becomes less sensitive to exposure as 
> time goes on. So it is possible to gain detail in the highlights 
> without the risk of blocking up the shadow detail. I am not sure how 
> this helps, but I thought I would throw it onto the table.
> 
> > 2. The dark end of the negative has an extreme image % 
> > vs print density curve that needs to be straightened. 
> > this is true with both the epson driver and the peizo 
> > driver. Applying a correction in curves with this 
> > results in noticeable posterization. If this could be 
> > handled in 16 bits in a rip, that may take care of it.
> 
> I don't see why it could not. In fact, using CMYK inks to make the 
> negatives as colorized monochrome images, a standard RIP could be 
> used to take advantage of the RIPs dither, ink channel, reduction 
> and adjustment capabilities.
> 
> > I'm glad to hear others are interested in pursueing this.
> 
> I think that unless someone is having great success with making 
> negatives on a 1280, or 10000 and is willing to share the successes 
> publicly, this may be a long arduous process.
> 
> I will eventually ask Martin and Antonis to include a digital 
> negative section in the Files area as a database so that we can all 
> share our triumphs and failures. 
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other 
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them 
> short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various 
> resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
>

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by Paul Roark

Roy,

>...I'd much rather have something I can do myself.

Definitely.

>...what transparency material to use.

See http://www.pictorico.com/roll.asp

Paul 
http://www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by Michael J. Kravit

Thanks Larry,

Mike
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 05:22 PM, lrryr@... wrote:

> One other thing worth mentioning, I believe, but havnt
> substantiated, that the peizo inks are more opaque to uv
> than a densitometer will tell you. I've set my negatives
> density's to 1.0 or so on my densitometer and I believe
> I get pretty good range on my ziatypes. Unfortunately my
> time available for this is so sporadic I havnt arrived
> at any definite conclusions.
>
> Also I've written an excel spreadsheet that does the
> nescessary interpolation for generating new transfer
> functions or curves after printing and reading a step
> wedge. I'll put it up on the web for download when I get
> home tonight.
>
> Larry
>> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., lrryr@a... wrote:
>>> The only transparency material out there (that I know
>>> of) that will hold enough ink to get the density's
>>> needed is Pictorico OHP.
>>>
>>> The problems are:
>>>
>>> 1. Zero dot gain, any inconsistancy in the printing
>>> sticks out like a sore thumb, the dither patterns (and
>>> the peizo pattern) are painfully apparent.
>>
>> Larry,
>>
>> So what you are saying is that the ink does not spread amd absorb
>> into the media to hide imperfections. I guess this is where the very
>> small print head nozzles would be beneficial.
>>
>> A friend of mine is making 4x5 negatives on Pictorico OHP utilizing
>> Berkholder's methods. There are two ways he makes desktop negatives.
>> One is using color fill and the other is called something else. It
>> is this second method that Tom says works the best. His 4x5 Platinum
>> prints look as nice as his prints made from the duplicate negatives.
>>
>> The texture and properties of the fine art watercolor papers that
>> are coated with Platinum salts are much like the digital papers. The
>> inherently hide the imperfections. The platinum process is self
>> masking. That is the emulsion becomes less sensitive to exposure as
>> time goes on. So it is possible to gain detail in the highlights
>> without the risk of blocking up the shadow detail. I am not sure how
>> this helps, but I thought I would throw it onto the table.
>>
>>> 2. The dark end of the negative has an extreme image %
>>> vs print density curve that needs to be straightened.
>>> this is true with both the epson driver and the peizo
>>> driver. Applying a correction in curves with this
>>> results in noticeable posterization. If this could be
>>> handled in 16 bits in a rip, that may take care of it.
>>
>> I don't see why it could not. In fact, using CMYK inks to make the
>> negatives as colorized monochrome images, a standard RIP could be
>> used to take advantage of the RIPs dither, ink channel, reduction
>> and adjustment capabilities.
>>
>>> I'm glad to hear others are interested in pursueing this.
>>
>> I think that unless someone is having great success with making
>> negatives on a 1280, or 10000 and is willing to share the successes
>> publicly, this may be a long arduous process.
>>
>> I will eventually ask Martin and Antonis to include a digital
>> negative section in the Files area as a database so that we can all
>> share our triumphs and failures.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
>> and other
>> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>>
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>>
>> Please follow these basic guidelines:
>> - Include your full name with your message.
>> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
>> keep them
>> short.
>> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
>> header.
>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
>> "flames."
>> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
>> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
>> various
>> resources on the homepage.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-01 by lrryr@attbi.com

FYI, the pictorico OHP is available in 11x17 and 13x19 
now, and per sq inch cost is less than the roll price, 
at least last time I checked.

Larry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Roy,
> 
> >...I'd much rather have something I can do myself.
> 
> Definitely.
> 
> >...what transparency material to use.
> 
> See http://www.pictorico.com/roll.asp
> 
> Paul 
> http://www.PaulRoark.com
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other 
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them 
> short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various 
> resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
>

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-02 by marktuckerdotcom

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> However, if they can't tell the difference, and if we simply label 
out
> prints as "silver" or "platinum," it should make life a little more
> difficult for the anti-digital bigots.

Paul,

I think you're right on track here. Trust me, as soon as these 
gallery people see any of the words "inkjet", or "Piezo", or 
anything remotely resembling digital, they cross their arms and 
you're out the door. I expect this to continue, if not even get 
worse.

Since I only use digital technology, sadly I am not even exploring 
the gallery/print sales thing any more. It's a dead end street. 
(Whether or not it's based in fact, because as we know, and Bill 
Clinton knows, perception is much more strong that actual 
reality).

So I'm going back to the commercial world.

So, for you guys, I agree, that as long as the PRINT is silver, or 
platinum, or anything but inkjet, I think you're fine. The final print, 
paper, is all they seem to care about. How you arrive at that end 
is your own business, but just make sure the print is silver. 
Otherwise, I guarantee you, you're in for a hard fight.

Just my opinion. I might be wrong. But I've seen it in the 
trenches.

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-02 by Michael J. Kravit

Mark,

Un fortunately I believe that you are correct.

The only exception to what you are saying is museums. I am seeing lots 
of museum exhibits of digitally produced images. It is tha galleries 
that are the issue.

Mike
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 10:03 AM, marktuckerdotcom wrote:

> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark"
> <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
>> However, if they can't tell the difference, and if we simply label
> out
>> prints as "silver" or "platinum," it should make life a little more
>> difficult for the anti-digital bigots.
>
> Paul,
>
> I think you're right on track here. Trust me, as soon as these
> gallery people see any of the words "inkjet", or "Piezo", or
> anything remotely resembling digital, they cross their arms and
> you're out the door. I expect this to continue, if not even get
> worse.
>
> Since I only use digital technology, sadly I am not even exploring
> the gallery/print sales thing any more. It's a dead end street.
> (Whether or not it's based in fact, because as we know, and Bill
> Clinton knows, perception is much more strong that actual
> reality).
>
> So I'm going back to the commercial world.
>
> So, for you guys, I agree, that as long as the PRINT is silver, or
> platinum, or anything but inkjet, I think you're fine. The final print,
> paper, is all they seem to care about. How you arrive at that end
> is your own business, but just make sure the print is silver.
> Otherwise, I guarantee you, you're in for a hard fight.
>
> Just my opinion. I might be wrong. But I've seen it in the
> trenches.
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-02 by marktuckerdotcom

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Michael J. Kravit 
<mjkaia@k...> wrote:
> Mark,
> The only exception to what you are saying is museums. I am 
seeing lots 
> of museum exhibits of digitally produced images. It is tha 
galleries 
> that are the issue.


For every one successful Gursky, there are five hundred digital 
guys who've been turned away. At least right now, it is an 
impossible battle. Who knows if it'll change, if ever? You already 
see the silver guys digging in their heels with fervor; they see the 
surge of digital, and are doing everything they can to batten down 
the hatches.

The only other approach that I COULD see working: direct sales 
from the artists' themselves, from their own personal websites. 
That way, you eliminate the snooty gallery person at the front 
door.

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-03 by Bill Agee

At 2:03 PM +0000 5/2/02, marktuckerdotcom wrote:
>
>Paul,
>
>I think you're right on track here. Trust me, as soon as these
>gallery people see any of the words "inkjet", or "Piezo", or
>anything remotely resembling digital, they cross their arms and
>you're out the door. I expect this to continue, if not even get
>worse.
>
>Since I only use digital technology, sadly I am not even exploring
>the gallery/print sales thing any more. It's a dead end street.
>(Whether or not it's based in fact, because as we know, and Bill
>Clinton knows, perception is much more strong that actual
>reality).
>
>So I'm going back to the commercial world.
>
>So, for you guys, I agree, that as long as the PRINT is silver, or
>platinum, or anything but inkjet, I think you're fine. The final print,
>paper, is all they seem to care about. How you arrive at that end
>is your own business, but just make sure the print is silver.
>Otherwise, I guarantee you, you're in for a hard fight.
>
>Just my opinion. I might be wrong. But I've seen it in the
>trenches.
>

My feelings for a long time have been that the Photo Gallery 
establishment is the Taliban of the art world.  They are very 
tradition bound and have a very strict code of what they deem ok and 
not ok.  Just go to any of the East and West Coast shows where many 
of the high end photography galleries have booths.....very little 
experimental work, recycling of the same old names...year after 
year...with a few anointed up and coming "wunderkind" who do 8x10 
photos of their friends and family nude, dead or both...

Bill Agee
-- 

b i l l  a g e e  s t u d i o
c a p i s t r a n o  b e a c h  c a l i f o r n i a

billagee@...
http://www.redsilver.com

[Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-03 by butchhul

And the usual 50-60% comissions.

Butch

> For every one successful Gursky, there are five hundred digital 
> guys who've been turned away. At least right now, it is an 
> impossible battle. Who knows if it'll change, if ever? You 
already 
> see the silver guys digging in their heels with fervor; they see 
the 
> surge of digital, and are doing everything they can to batten 
down 
> the hatches.
> 
> The only other approach that I COULD see working: direct 
sales 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> from the artists' themselves, from their own personal websites. 
> That way, you eliminate the snooty gallery person at the front 
> door.

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-03 by jt

year after 
> year...with a few anointed up and coming "wunderkind" who do 8x10 
> photos of their friends and family nude, dead or both...
> 
> Bill Agee
> -- 
> 
Ahhh OK... so if i do that with the HOLGA am I retro, neo, or pseudo...
Julian

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-03 by Tim Spragens

Julian, you've been holding out! Where are your dead-naked-famly-
friends Holga pictures?

Tim

> year after 
> > year...with a few anointed up and coming "wunderkind" who do 8x10 
> > photos of their friends and family nude, dead or both...
> > 
> > Bill Agee
> > -- 
> > 
> Ahhh OK... so if i do that with the HOLGA am I retro, neo, or pseudo...
> Julian
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


-- 
Tim Spragens

http://www.borderless-photos.de
http://www.borderless-photos.com

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Silver/Platinum

2002-05-03 by Carolyn Frayn

There was that one rather stoney fellow with the, uh, sword...

C
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Julian, you've been holding out! Where are your dead-naked-famly-
> friends Holga pictures?
> 
> Tim

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.