Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2002-09-29 by jean wall penland
uh oh i am in the same EAM batch though i have not opened it yet altex as well if anyone hears anything, let me know jwp/jno shilesh wrote: > The paper I bought was also from Atlex, 8.5 x 11, Lot No. 02CC2004M.<
2002-09-29 by Phil & Marilu Morse
Shilesh, I read your post last week and can confirm: the 8.5X11 just recieved from Atlex (02CC2004M) is warmer. A 100 count batch of 13X19 I recieved at the same time (01KK2002M) has not changed from previous batches.............except they forgot to put their logos and arrows on the back. ;-) Phil Morse BTW; the letter size is still marked EAM, the larger size is marked EEM. ----- Original Message -----
From: "Shilesh Jani" <shilesh.jani@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 11:41 AM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: New EAM & MediaStreet Royal Renaissance (PhotoRag) > Paul, > > I posted a message about a month ago on new EAM being warmer. The > paper I bought was also from Atlex, 8.5 x 11, Lot No. 02CC2004M. I > found the same Lot No. at the local CompUSA, equally warm. And yes, > it has weeker blacks. What size did you order? I have not contacted > Epson yet, but perhaps we should. I am not sure if this is a > manufacturing anomaly, or if they have a new paper/coating. > Honestly, this is really bad because EAM is THE inexpensive steady > war-horse, or was until now. I have yet to find another inexpensive > paper with the attributes of EAM. I hope Epson rectifies this > situation. > > Shilesh