Re: [Digital BW] B&W Mag on Collecting Prints
2002-11-01 by Jerry Olson
Paul, isn't this the magazine that won't accept digital prints for reproduction? They said digital printing isn't good enough yet? Or was this some other magazine? Jerry Paul Roark wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > I think all avid B&W digital printers should have a copy of the December > 2002 issue of "B&W" magazine. > > The article on collecting touches on a number of issues that interest me. > > It's not just about collectors. For me, it's also about being sure my great > grandkids can see what freaks they had for relatives. > > It's also about how the digital controls and processes continue to enhance > my ability to make what I see in my mind's eye happen on paper for others. > > The factors the B&W Mag article highlights are factors that have enhanced > the appreciation of fine photography for a long time. Digital printing is a > part of this evolution. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/