Digital BW, The Print

From: <gschern@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:57 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 PixelPixasso Information


> I know some of you have discussed this a little, but I figured there
> was no need to wait for PMA! I've posted information and some quick
> scans from some prints on our site at
> http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm
>
> Have a great day!
>
> Gregory Schern
> InkjetGoodies.com

From: <gschern@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:57 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 PixelPixasso Information


> I know some of you have discussed this a little, but I figured there
> was no need to wait for PMA! I've posted information and some quick
> scans from some prints on our site at
> http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm
>

From: "Thomas Fors" <tom@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone and R9 PixelPixasso Information


> Has anyone else noticed the striking similarity between the way the
Septone
> and PixelPixasso product on that page is described (What it is... What is
is
> not... No secrets...) and Jon Cone's teaser about his new product?

Tom,

Isn't marketing grand?!? <G> Although I have to put Sundance a bit ahead in
the info department at this point. It is all very interesting but until you
can actually buy it and try it, it is up for grabs.
>
> BTW, I'm pretty sure I'm not pronouncing "Pixasso" properly.  My brain
keeps
> telling me it should be pronounced differently from "Picasso!" :-)

More interesting, "Pixel Pixasso" is much to long to type and is going to
get shortened to "PP". Hmmmm...

Martin

(snip earlier)

> > scans from some prints on our site at
> > http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm
> >